4 ms·
> The fact that one has to pick from many different places to set up an account is a massive barrier to entry... I wonder if a statement exactly like the above
by mxuribe 4y ago
> The fact that one has to pick from many different places to set up an account is a massive barrier to entry...
I wonder if a statement exactly like the above one was said about alternative email providers being coinsidered by many AOL.com account holder so many years ago?
> ...I don’t see this platform being able to benefit from the Twitter exodus...
I suppoose it depends on how "benefit" is defined. But, also, Mastodon might be considered a platform, but (thankfully!) it only represents a single slice of the greater fediverse.
Ultimately, if people chose NOT to migrate over to the fediverse, or choose NOT to use the mastodon stack, or do NOT join an instance, etc..., that's still ok, and not considered a "fail". The fediverse is not an industry, nor a competitive landscape in the same fashion that twitter, facebook and other commercial platforms might operate. In fact, the fediverse is not even a platform at all; its a federated network.
- sp332 4y agoYeah, and what happened with email is everyone moved to gmail and corporate servers. Having a choice of hosts is not something most people are looking for.
- toofy 4y agoif mastodon continues with the growth and hits some kind of critical mass, im sure eventually most people will end up on a few concentrated servers. that just makes sense for people who aren't interested in minutia and want details abstracted away. tons of people use gmail and an awful lot of people don't, they make their own choices. the people who do care about otehr things can go to the more specialized servers. everyone wins. getting back to a norm where people have choice seems ideal from my perspective.