11 ms·
>I think Arch and FreeBSD have a lot in common, Well yes sure, Arch was made with Crux in mind, and Crux is: https://crux.nu/ https://crux.nu/ >>CRUX is a li
by nix23 4y ago
>I think Arch and FreeBSD have a lot in common,
Well yes sure, Arch was made with Crux in mind, and Crux is:
https://crux.nu/ https://crux.nu/
>>CRUX is a lightweight Linux distribution for the x86-64 architecture targeted at experienced Linux users. The primary focus of this distribution is keep it simple, which is reflected in a straightforward tar.gz-based package system, BSD-style initscripts, and a relatively small collection of trimmed packages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_Linux#History https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_Linux#History
>>Inspired by CRUX, another minimalist distribution, Judd Vinet started the Arch Linux project in March 2002. The name was chosen because Vinet liked the word's meaning of "the principal," as in "arch-enemy"
BTW Crux is still a great distro, limited packages yes, but absolutely simple and rocksolid.
- GekkePrutser 4y agoCool I had no idea about that. I like FreeBSD though but still, good to know. When I use Linux now (usually for docker stuff on servers) I tend to use alpine which has a similar focus on simplicity.
- nix23 4y agoI like FreeBSB too...well it's my main system since years >8 probably. But if it need's to be linux then Alpine Arch Crux....or the RHEL's Debian's...if i really have to use them.