4 ms·
Makes me wonder if instead of settling it would be cheaper to buy the patent, knowing that the patent "owner" is only getting 5-10% of a settlement. Presumably
by TheAdamist 4y ago
Makes me wonder if instead of settling it would be cheaper to buy the patent, knowing that the patent "owner" is only getting 5-10% of a settlement.
Presumably theres some contract with the patent "owner" preventing that, but maybe that would show they aren't really in control of the patent.
- bombcar 4y agoThere almost certainly is, which is part of the reason the judge is poking this - "ownership" includes control and if they aren't really in control they're not really the patent 'owner' and that could change things. Also judges in general don't like people being "clever".
- duxup 4y ago“Dude you made 11k from this and now you’re in court. Judge is pissed, you might be in over your head. Sell me the patents for 10k, and we all can move on.”