6 ms·
For what it's worth the reason I posted the dw.com article was that it did not have a paywall. As to why they are not directly linking to sources I assume it h
by the_mitsuhiko 4y ago
For what it's worth the reason I posted the dw.com article was that it did not have a paywall. As to why they are not directly linking to sources I assume it has to do with advertisement traffic.
- pvg 4y agoIt's a dupe for now anyway https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33499366 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33499366
- seydor 4y agodw is a public service. most likely they dont want to link to paywalls
- gregdoesit 4y agoAh, got it. I still find it just weird practice to not link to the source, making it harder for people reading articles to find them.