Are you telling me that you live where it is legal to possess, let alone publish/distribute/“free speech”, photographs of children being raped? Because that is

Are you telling me that you live where it is legal to possess, let alone publish/distribute/“free speech”, photographs of children being raped? Because that is literally what happened circa I’m going to say 1992ish on Usenet, and not in overly obscure newsgroups, but also the ordinary default newsgroups. There is no unmoderated free speech because sick freaks will always do horrible things with their speech if they think they can get away with it. This is as factual as gravity: unmoderated free speech will never be legal speech. Further, you don’t want unmoderated free speech. You cannot unsee those photos.