This is fake. The article switches part-way through from claiming a 10x improvement in range, which would be a transformative breakthrough but which would funda

This is fake. The article switches part-way through from claiming a 10x improvement in range, which would be a transformative breakthrough but which would fundamentally require doing something other than storing hydrogen gas in a pressure vessel, to talking about about improvements in the fuel cell, which is not the bottleneck for hydrogen-vehicle range. Hydrogen continues to not be a viable fuel for cars, because it isn't dense enough.