3 ms·
This is a much more sensible approach vs the "installer lock" apple took.
by kennend3 4y ago
This is a much more sensible approach vs the "installer lock" apple took.
- Toutouxc 4y agoBut it isn’t the way Apple does things. They obviously don’t want Apple computers in the wild running a version of an Apple OS that might or might not work.
- kennend3 4y agoYes.. artificially limiting them from upgrading by checking the SMBIOS in the installer and preventing an upgrade is MUCH BETTER for the users. And as posted here several times, what about those who use opencore legacy patcher and upgrade despite the block. What "doesn't work" for them? SO to your point, apple prefers machines in the wild running an old and out of date OS because???