5 ms·
Water rights in the Southwest are complex, but in general, "surface water" (rivers and streams) is alloted according to historical water rights, but "ground wat
by nkurz 4y ago
Water rights in the Southwest are complex, but in general, "surface water" (rivers and streams) is alloted according to historical water rights, but "ground water" (drilled wells) is available to whoever owns the land on the surface. From the article:
Groundwater is the lifeblood of the rural Southwest, but just as the Colorado River Basin is in crisis, aquifers are rapidly depleting from decades of overuse, worsening drought and rampant agricultural growth.
Residents and farms pull water from the same underground pools, and as the water table declines, the thing determining how long a well lasts is how deeply it was drilled.
Now frustration is growing in Arizona's La Paz County, as shallower wells run dry amid the Southwest's worst drought in 1,200 years. Much of the frustration is pointed at the area's huge, foreign-owned farms growing thirsty crops like alfalfa, which ultimately get shipped to feed cattle and other livestock overseas.
"You can't take water and export it out of the state, there's laws about that," said Arizona geohydrologist Marvin Glotfelty, a well-drilling expert. "But you can take 'virtual' water and export it; alfalfa, cotton, electricity or anything created in part from the use of water."
Residents and local officials say lax groundwater laws give agriculture the upper hand, allowing farms to pump unlimited water as long as they own or lease the property to drill wells into. In around 80% of the state, Arizona has no laws overseeing how much water corporate megafarms are using, nor is there any way for the state to track it.
Essentially, this means that in most of Arizona, the water in the ground is free and unmetered for agricultural use by anyone who owns enough land to drill a well. As one would guess, this creates a crisis when some users are drawing enough water to lower the water table on surrounding land.
- supportlocal4h 4y agoIt is not true that ground water from wells is freely available to whomever owns the land. See recent judgements regarding multi-billion dollar disputes in Nevada, Idaho, and Utah. It is not a new thing for some wells to run dry because of neighbors' water use. And it isn't catching anybody by surprise. There's a whole lot of gunfighters flowing into these here parts. Uh hem, sorry. I mean lawyers.
- nkurz 4y agoI was definitely handwaving when I said "in general", but I meant something like "in the absence of local laws to the contrary". And (without sufficiently specifying) I intended to limit my comment to Arizona because that was the focus of the article. Arizona is different than the other Southwestern states. Here's what seems like a more complete overview: https://groundwater.stanford.edu/dashboard/arizona.html https://groundwater.stanford.edu/dashboard/arizona.html Note that unlike the other states you mentioned, the standard in Arizona is "reasonable use". Texas is the other big outlier. Do you have links (or good search terms) for the recent judgments you refer to? I know some things about this area (certainly enough to call it "complex"), but there is a lot I'm ignorant of.
- supportlocal4h 4y agoSNWA loses another water fight Great Basin Water Network court case SNWA water war Snake Valley production wells Tribal leaders oppose southern nevada water
- mjhay 4y agoThose are in Nevada and Idaho, not Arizona.
- supportlocal4h 4y agoYes. While I originally disagreed with nkurz, I responded to their non-confrontational approach. So the above is not an argument, it's a cooperation. (I know; weird)