4 ms·

It’s not sexy but it’s true. Asteroid mining will completely change life on earth. Imagine the technical implications of copper, gold, platinum, etc becoming a

It’s not sexy but it’s true. Asteroid mining will completely change life on earth. Imagine the technical implications of copper, gold, platinum, etc becoming as cheap and abundant as tin foil.

Moissanite 4y ago
I imagine the most efficient option will be to either crash the asteroids into the Earth directly (assuming they aren't too big), or "land" them on the moon for exploitation there. Sending a whole mining/refining rig to each asteroid feels a bit too high risk.
- dr_dshiv 4y ago
  Disagree. You can just electromagnetic mass drive the finished good back to earth orbit for collection.
  - pencilguin 4y ago
    Right. The bottom of a gravity well is a nuisance for anything other than human survival.
  - Moissanite 4y ago
    You can't "just" do anything. Landing a significant payload on an asteroid is barely do-able right now. We are a long way from building mining rigs and railguns up there; clamping on an engine and some extra propellant is much more viable in the near term - generously estimated at within the next 30 years.
    - Nomentatus 4y ago
      You're right, efficiency won't come first - but you're replying to a comment about efficient means. I'm 65plus, 30 yrs doesn't seem so very long to me.
    - dr_dshiv 4y ago
      The point is that if each return journey requires propellant, you need to restock. An EM rail gun can just use solar power for continuous return. Rail guns are a present day technology. You will already need substantial solar power and batteries, that’s not in question.
      - Moissanite 4y ago
        No-one is talking about multiple round trips to the asteroid. Moving the whole asteroid at once to a more mine-able location (the bottom of a gravity well, where people can actually use the material) is what I expect to be easier near term. Mass-driving from the asteroid to a target location is interesting too, but seems even more sci-fi. Frankly I don't expect to see either happen in my lifetime.
  - Nomentatus 4y ago
    Or even physical catapult.
krono 4y ago
Only very few things worth having with an actual finite supply will remain. Land ownership on earth would be a big one. As a great filter candidate, this transition could either allow for those massive technologically advancements, but it could just as well have us end up in another stone-age.

It’s not sexy but it’s true. Asteroid mining will completely change life on earth. Imagine the technical implications of copper, gold, platinum, etc becoming as cheap and abundant as tin foil.

Moissanite 4y ago

I imagine the most efficient option will be to either crash the asteroids into the Earth directly (assuming they aren't too big), or "land" them on the moon for exploitation there. Sending a whole mining/refining rig to each asteroid feels a bit too high risk.

dr_dshiv 4y ago
Disagree. You can just electromagnetic mass drive the finished good back to earth orbit for collection.
- pencilguin 4y ago
  Right. The bottom of a gravity well is a nuisance for anything other than human survival.
- Moissanite 4y ago
  You can't "just" do anything. Landing a significant payload on an asteroid is barely do-able right now. We are a long way from building mining rigs and railguns up there; clamping on an engine and some extra propellant is much more viable in the near term - generously estimated at within the next 30 years.
  - Nomentatus 4y ago
    You're right, efficiency won't come first - but you're replying to a comment about efficient means. I'm 65plus, 30 yrs doesn't seem so very long to me.
  - dr_dshiv 4y ago
    The point is that if each return journey requires propellant, you need to restock. An EM rail gun can just use solar power for continuous return. Rail guns are a present day technology. You will already need substantial solar power and batteries, that’s not in question.
    - Moissanite 4y ago
      No-one is talking about multiple round trips to the asteroid. Moving the whole asteroid at once to a more mine-able location (the bottom of a gravity well, where people can actually use the material) is what I expect to be easier near term. Mass-driving from the asteroid to a target location is interesting too, but seems even more sci-fi. Frankly I don't expect to see either happen in my lifetime.
- Nomentatus 4y ago
  Or even physical catapult.

krono 4y ago

Only very few things worth having with an actual finite supply will remain. Land ownership on earth would be a big one. As a great filter candidate, this transition could either allow for those massive technologically advancements, but it could just as well have us end up in another stone-age.