Having written a Forth, and a long standing interest in it... I've come to the conclusion that Forth is the crippled inverse of Lisp They are both very minimal

Having written a Forth, and a long standing interest in it... I've come to the conclusion that Forth is the crippled inverse of Lisp They are both very minimal in their syntax, for many purposes Forth uses a space where lisp uses parenthesis to ensure the arguments are consumed by the correct functions. However.... you can't match spaces, which leads to losing track of arguments on the stack I can think of ways this could be handled in an IDE, but my bet on Forth includes types, and operator overloading, a language called STOIC in the 1960s.