3 ms·
It seems the entire article can be reduced to: China has their own railway standard. And they are pushing it when they build railways as part of the belt and ro
by fxtentacle 4y ago
It seems the entire article can be reduced to: China has their own railway standard. And they are pushing it when they build railways as part of the belt and road initiative.
- halJordan 4y ago
- karmakaze 4y agoRead the article, this is a good TL;DR. There was a China Standards 2035 linked but I didn't try to read a translation of it. Does anyone know if it says anything specific other than for rail or transportation? The article also seems confused: > On the domestic front, “the idea is to set technical standards high, essentially forcing manufacturers to upgrade their processes whether they want to or not,” Matt Sheehan, Marjory Blumenthal and Michael Nelson of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace wrote. (China’s scientific research in the Arctic also plays a role in encouraging advanced industrial development.) A grade standard (like military spec environmental ICs) is quite different than an interoperability standard (like pin spacing on ICs).