That's rather dismissive. I use Go. I like it a lot, its a really practical language that helps me get a lot of stuff done. That's pretty much gold standard for

That's rather dismissive. I use Go. I like it a lot, its a really practical language that helps me get a lot of stuff done. That's pretty much gold standard for programming languages to me. But it is clear that Go is stupidly wordy when dealing with errors and examining ways to fix that should be something we're open to. FWIW I don't like the original proposal nor the article's solution to it