You didn't finish your argument. It could also be not just "whenever he intervenes he makes it worse, any company that is successful is so because he gets out o

You didn't finish your argument. It could also be not just "whenever he intervenes he makes it worse, any company that is successful is so because he gets out of the way" — but also "whenever he intervenes he makes things better, any company that is a failure is so because he got of the way". That too is not mutually exclusive.