>> Neuralink potentially has some major long term foundational changes, but the tech is probably 10 years too early to build a successful company around. (Howev

>> Neuralink potentially has some major long term foundational changes, but the tech is probably 10 years too early to build a successful company around. (However I think this is potentially Musk's most important future company beyond Spacex.) No it's not 10 years too early, it's 50 years late to the party - but your conclusion could very well be right regardless. Non-invasive BCI surpassed everything Neuralink has done so far decades ago, however it's not super relevant since the capabilities of micro electronics skyrocketed; and perhaps indeed beyond SpaceX potential. If you can't afford BCI for your children, in the future they will be doomed to be blue collar as all those who do will have children with brains supported or adjusted for them to pass the highest levels of education & training within shorter amounts of time thus will rule the world. The most famous example of things like this already in use today is DARPA / US Snipers doubling some of their test scores using BCI. This is just the beginning. See the link below for more information. https://totaltdcs.com/uploads/docs/darpa-operational-neuroscience-intelligence-community-forum-dr-amy-kruse.pdf https://totaltdcs.com/uploads/docs/darpa-operational-neurosc...