> that he's just lucky In a capitalistic world, if someone is so lucky that he could churn out successful companies one after another, then he is an investment

> that he's just lucky In a capitalistic world, if someone is so lucky that he could churn out successful companies one after another, then he is an investment genius, his luckiness is a super power belongs to him and him alone, not anyone else, so capital, in forms of both money and talents, will still follow. Regardless, he is so influential yet controversial it is going to be very difficult to objectively assess his work and impact. Certainly I won't buy a cent what some media experts said about him at current moment.