3 ms·

'digital nomads' usually stay the whole allotted tourist visa stay, while injecting the local economy with cash the entire time, and not taking up any sort of s

'digital nomads' usually stay the whole allotted tourist visa stay, while injecting the local economy with cash the entire time, and not taking up any sort of social resources or government benefits. anecdotal as an English teacher turned programmer who lived in CDMX 2014-2017 (before large influx of digital nomads and then waves of COVID tourists) Just totally cringing watching my mexican dj friends in CDMX complain about all the gringo tourists ruining everything in cuauhtemoc/roma norte but then posting instagram stories " hey looking for booking in USA/Germany/etc for November or December, also subletting my apartment" (also posting it in English).. It's like living in a Beverly Hills mansion and getting angry at the rich Chinese tourists spending money on Rodeo drive for two weeks.

tjr225 4y ago
b4je7d7wb 4y ago
Staying 3 months vs 2 weeks seems like a very small difference. The other points apply to tourists as well. One could argue 6 tourists each staying 2 weeks concecutively will spend more than a nomad, since they dont spend time working. So in this case the nomad would be worse, since he still takes similar real estate to host, but provides less to the economy. Either way I think it's more useful to consider them together with tourists. Many backpackers are probably indistinguishable from nomads.
- safety1st 4y ago
  The distinction is only meaningless for you because you've chosen to redefine the term digital nomad. One of the original inspirations for the digital nomad movement was the book Vagabonding: An Uncommon Guide to the Art of Long-Term World Travel, written by Rolf Potts. Long-term (and its gradual side effects) is really the key here. The differences between a DN and a tourist are: 1) The DN spends many months or years on the road, such that the nexus of their personal affairs stops being their home country, residency becomes an issue they have to think about, etc. - this doesn't happen with a tourist 2) The DN's primary income generating activities continue during this period, such that the labor laws of the countries they visit become an issue they have to think about -- again doesn't happen with a tourist I agree that if someone takes a 3 month holiday and works on their laptop during it, they're a tourist. We don't need to use DN to describe those people, they are not really practicing long term travel as Potts described it. The term more accurately describes the growing number of people who are going to another level and really disconnecting from their home country. DNs in this sense spend a lot of money in the countries they visit - it varies widely based on their income and how much of the year they spend traveling, but most of them spend somewhere between $20K-$200K/yr. Even on the low end this is way more money than most tourists spend.
unity1001 4y ago
> while injecting the local economy with cash the entire time, and not taking up any sort of social resources or government benefits. They unfortunately jack up the prices way beyond the financial power of the locals, cause gentrification and push the locals out.
- poisonarena 4y ago
  that is actually not true.On a macro level rich people do that in their own neighborhood. digital nomads, and even expats are barely a drop in the bucket. It is like getting getting worked up about a rat in the kitchen when your whole house is being demolished by a swarm of army ants
  - unity1001 4y ago
    > On a macro level rich people do that in their own neighborhood That's what nomadism does - bring in to neighborhoods people who are relatively far richer than the locals. > digital nomads, and even expats are barely a drop in the bucket Sorry, but nomads and expats are a major source of complaint in the locales they flood, and many of them are also aware of it and they complain about it.

tjr225 4y ago

b4je7d7wb 4y ago

Staying 3 months vs 2 weeks seems like a very small difference. The other points apply to tourists as well. One could argue 6 tourists each staying 2 weeks concecutively will spend more than a nomad, since they dont spend time working. So in this case the nomad would be worse, since he still takes similar real estate to host, but provides less to the economy. Either way I think it's more useful to consider them together with tourists. Many backpackers are probably indistinguishable from nomads.

safety1st 4y ago
The distinction is only meaningless for you because you've chosen to redefine the term digital nomad. One of the original inspirations for the digital nomad movement was the book Vagabonding: An Uncommon Guide to the Art of Long-Term World Travel, written by Rolf Potts. Long-term (and its gradual side effects) is really the key here. The differences between a DN and a tourist are: 1) The DN spends many months or years on the road, such that the nexus of their personal affairs stops being their home country, residency becomes an issue they have to think about, etc. - this doesn't happen with a tourist 2) The DN's primary income generating activities continue during this period, such that the labor laws of the countries they visit become an issue they have to think about -- again doesn't happen with a tourist I agree that if someone takes a 3 month holiday and works on their laptop during it, they're a tourist. We don't need to use DN to describe those people, they are not really practicing long term travel as Potts described it. The term more accurately describes the growing number of people who are going to another level and really disconnecting from their home country. DNs in this sense spend a lot of money in the countries they visit - it varies widely based on their income and how much of the year they spend traveling, but most of them spend somewhere between $20K-$200K/yr. Even on the low end this is way more money than most tourists spend.

unity1001 4y ago

> while injecting the local economy with cash the entire time, and not taking up any sort of social resources or government benefits. They unfortunately jack up the prices way beyond the financial power of the locals, cause gentrification and push the locals out.

poisonarena 4y ago
that is actually not true.On a macro level rich people do that in their own neighborhood. digital nomads, and even expats are barely a drop in the bucket. It is like getting getting worked up about a rat in the kitchen when your whole house is being demolished by a swarm of army ants
- unity1001 4y ago
  > On a macro level rich people do that in their own neighborhood That's what nomadism does - bring in to neighborhoods people who are relatively far richer than the locals. > digital nomads, and even expats are barely a drop in the bucket Sorry, but nomads and expats are a major source of complaint in the locales they flood, and many of them are also aware of it and they complain about it.