3 ms·
Hmm, typically blogs are defined as Web 2.0 rather than 1.0, because easy to use and allow collaboration (comments). I think that you just mean "platforms" ? T
by BlueTemplar 4y ago
Hmm, typically blogs are defined as Web 2.0 rather than 1.0, because easy to use and allow collaboration (comments).
I think that you just mean "platforms" ? They are indeed bad, being closed and centralized... ("protocols, not platforms" !) not sure that you want to associate yourself semantically with them ?
- EGreg 4y agoComments are barely collaboration. Qbix supports: events, videoconferencing, livestreaming, calling into the show, group reservations, paying for them, earning credits, sharing content, collaborating on various files, scheduling team meetings, dating, making appointments, teaching students, and more. That's what Web 2.0 is Four years ago I started a Web 3.0 company called intercoin.org -- with the same approach. It also has a free open-source set of applications https://intercoin.org/applications https://intercoin.org/applications But that one is "cryptocurrency-related" so I'm sure people on HN will automatically think it's a scam lol. Even though you can just take the code and do whatever you want with it.