No, the alterative is that the opinion is voiced by someone specific, anonymous or not, with everyone's intuition about people saying things coming into account

No, the alterative is that the opinion is voiced by someone specific, anonymous or not, with everyone's intuition about people saying things coming into account. The way it's implemented, the opinion is practically anonymous, with no one accountable for it, but given a false cover of authority. If the context is an article by someone, I don't mind if the algorithm somehow finds the relevant twit by the relevant journalist who authored that article, and tends to show them together, as equals. That's fine by me. I disagree with the UI choice of giving visual significance to a specific opinion.