2 ms·
Probably not remotely practical, but I wonder what an online equivalent to the "do not call" list would look like.
by bobthepanda 4y ago
Probably not remotely practical, but I wonder what an online equivalent to the "do not call" list would look like.
- nullc 4y agoAfter it went through congress? Something like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003
- lob_it 4y agoDomestic network protocols make SPAM, sim jacking (sim swapping, sim hacking), malware and ransomeware limited to TCP/IP (aka the Internet). Mobile phones utilize IP networks (VoLTE or voice over data networks), so dialtone 2.0 becomes an easy option with domestic network protocols as well. ESIM is about to change dynamics as well, so any use of a phone number/SMS/2FA for identity verification is rendered null with the current system in place. https://consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2019/10/sim-swap-scams-how-protect-yourself https://consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2019/10/sim-swap-sc... Domestic networking protocols and dialtone 2.0 easily address most ransomware, malware, SPAM, etc much easier than trying to police 3rd world countries. That severe limitation of regulating 3rd world countries is also the same argument with climate change. The can continue to regulate their own soverign borders.