This is my concern as well. The idea here seems to be that the thing that offends the least must be fact. This behaves very differently for falsifiable vs. no

This is my concern as well. The idea here seems to be that the thing that offends the least must be fact. This behaves very differently for falsifiable vs. non-falsifiable information, but the end result is not something in which I'd place much stock either way. Edit: to be clear, from Twitter's perspective, this is excellent, i.e. this is precisely what a revenue-motivated entity would want. It's the rest of the world that I'm concerned about.