3 ms·

> You claimed to know such data. Can you please give a link to the message where I claimed to know such data?

• tchaffee 4y ago
  Sure: > Trump provided a lot of engagement and popularity to the platform, so banning him was igealogy-driven and was very much against their business interests. You either have those engagement numbers or you don't. Which is it? You either know how much advertising revenue he generated -or- how much he drove away. Or you don't. You either have evidence that banning him was against their business interests or you are just guessing. I don't think you have those numbers. You suggested Elon Musk might have those numbers. So it's pretty clear you yourself don't have the internal business numbers that would be used to make those decisions. Lacking sources to back up your claims, then you were arguing in bad faith. But I'm open minded. Feel free to back up that claim with actual evidence.
  • Andrew_nenakhov 4y ago
    So can't provide a link, and with your lie exposed, went into to panic mode, trying to pass your (false) assumptions as a claim I never made, ok.
    • tchaffee 4y ago
      I provided a quote of the claim you made up based on guesses you made and that you have no evidence for. There is nothing wrong with guessing, just admit it next time when someone asks for your source of data. Cute copying me with "panic mode". I appreciate the imitation. Didn't you resign a few comments ago? Or was that another false claim?