5 ms·
Huh I’m not an expert but doesn’t AWS already offer quantum computing as a service? https://aws.amazon.com/braket/ https://aws.amazon.com/braket/
by jacobsimon 4y ago
Huh I’m not an expert but doesn’t AWS already offer quantum computing as a service?
https://aws.amazon.com/braket/ https://aws.amazon.com/braket/
- krastanov 4y agoThey do not offer anything of use. This is just a demo for an API that in principle can be used as an "assembly language" for quantum computers, but it either runs on simulators that can not do more than 10 "perfect" qubits, or on hardware that has 100-ish "noisy" qubits. You need about a million "noisy" qubits, together with error correction codes, to encode 1000 logical "perfect" qubits. That is about the minimal number at which you can do something useful.
- sp332 4y agoAll true, but in the context of the thread, the future of quantum computing will probably be remote. So the bulk of the machinery is irrelevant.
- __MatrixMan__ 4y agoUnless the bulk required to be useful is infeasible to assemble anywhere.
- DonHopkins 4y agoYou'll need to build a Dyson Sphere to power your quantum chip factory! https://dyson-sphere-program.fandom.com/wiki/Quantum_Chip https://dyson-sphere-program.fandom.com/wiki/Quantum_Chip QUANTUM CHIPS Running low? Never Again! | Dyson Sphere Program Master Class https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-xAZj0C2yo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-xAZj0C2yo
- queuebert 4y agoOnce we get to 640,000 perfect qubits we'll be done, because no one needs more than 640k.
- heavyset_go 4y agoI thought this was simulated quantum annealing.