5 ms·
These are features that don't exist in Markdown though, unless there's some implementation that adds these. Also, the context of the parent comment and this pos
by nvrspyx 4y ago
These are features that don't exist in Markdown though, unless there's some implementation that adds these. Also, the context of the parent comment and this post is documentation.
So, is it worse than HTML? Maybe, if you need those features often, but not for documentation where you'll rarely, if ever, use those.
- jonhohle 4y agoAt least an originally designed markdown falls back to HTML when it doesn’t directly support a particular feature. With Pandoc, markdown can fall back to LaTeX as well.
- nvrspyx 4y agoYou can do the same in Asciidoc with the passthrough feature, either as an inline passthrough or a passthrough block. Granted, it's not syntax-less like Markdown, but it's there if you need it. Inline example: pass:[<u>underlined</u>] or +++<u>underlined</u>+++