2 ms·
You can save even more time by throwing it directly in the trash. Even Greenpeace now admits the obvious: recycling doesn’t work: https://www.city-journal.org/
by mhb 4y ago
You can save even more time by throwing it directly in the trash.
Even Greenpeace now admits the obvious: recycling doesn’t work:
https://www.city-journal.org/greenpeace-admits-recycling-doesnt-work https://www.city-journal.org/greenpeace-admits-recycling-doe...
- ZeroGravitas 4y agoThat guy writing the article is the same climate change denier who fronted the campaign that allowed the US to fail so miserably at recycling while other countries succeeded. A possibly phyrric victory since, as he points out, he hates Greenpeace USA's fallback position even more than he hates recycling, but that's a noose he created for his own neck. He told people recycling was impossible, Americans believed him, and now Greenpeace USA is successfully using that belief to leverage even greater moves to limit the use of single use plastics. You can now see places like Reason.com, that share his politics, desperately switiching to supporting recycling plastic, when the alternative is bans: These Environmentalists Want To Ban Single-Use Plastics Because Recycling Them 'Will Never Work' And yet infinitely recyclable plastics are on the horizon. https://reason.com/2022/05/31/environmentalists-ban-single-use-plastics/ https://reason.com/2022/05/31/environmentalists-ban-single-u... Oh, I wonder how they got the idea it would never work? https://reason.com/category/energy-environment/recycling/ https://reason.com/category/energy-environment/recycling/