4 ms·
Probably in more or less the same way multiple competing viewpoints and opinions improve the search for accurate information.
by hcta 4y ago
Probably in more or less the same way multiple competing viewpoints and opinions improve the search for accurate information.
- rini17 4y agoYes, monopoly on information is very bad. The other extreme, signal being drowned in noise is...we are finding out now, i guess.
- vannevar 4y agoThis kind of statement is often treated as axiomatic, but in real-world situations where disinformation is incentivized, is it actually true? I suspect there are a number of implicit conditions that must be met for this to hold, and that few of those conditions are met in the current media landscape.
- hcta 4y agoI don't hold it as axiomatic. You can read arguments for this position in works like On Liberty by Mill https://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlLbty.html https://www.econlib.org/library/Mill/mlLbty.html . But it seems obvious to me that it is true in that if there is a single predominant channel of information, any disinformation propagated on that channel will gain much more credence than if multiple competing channels are available. For example, you can read on how the war in Ukraine in its initial stages gained popular support in Russia as a mission of liberation and "de-Nazification." In support of this propaganda effort, independent news sources were shut down.