4 ms·
Right - I use echolocation (although rarely) and I can't work out why it's contentious to think that humans do.
by spindle 4y ago
Right - I use echolocation (although rarely) and I can't work out why it's contentious to think that humans do.
- dragonsky 4y agoIsn't it just a matter of listening to the ambient noise in your environment. open space sounds different to a closed room. if there is any noise around you can normally tell if you are near a wall just because one ear is getting a close echo from the wall, and the other isn't. I think most people use sound all the time to orient themselves, especially in the dark. It's just that we are so fixated on what we see that using hearing to tell what is around you gets overloaded by the higher resolution information from our eyes. I think I would be very interesting to see good research done with blind people to see how they use their senses. Is anybody aware of such research?
- mellavora 4y agoWell, you could look at i.e. Daniel Kish (as mentioned above). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kish https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Kish "Kish's work has inspired a number of scientific studies related to human echolocation. In a 2009 study at the University of Alcalá in Madrid, Spain, ten sighted subjects were taught basic navigation skills within a few days. The study aimed to analyze various sounds which can be used to echolocate and evaluate which were most effective.[5][6] In another study, MRI brain scans were taken of Kish and another echolocation expert to identify the parts of the brain involved in echolocation, with readings suggesting "that brain structures that process visual information in sighted people process echo information in blind echolocation experts." https://visioneers.org/daniel-kish/ https://visioneers.org/daniel-kish/
- blueflow 4y agoI use echolocation myself, > Isn't it just a matter of listening to the ambient noise in your environment. open space sounds different to a closed room. Yes. Absent of light and suitable noise, you make the noise yourself. And this is something instinctive to me, so i would assume other people could do it, too.
- rgrieselhuber 4y agoThere is a strong materialist bias to modern thinking that precludes having thoughts about any sort of sensory perception beyond the most basic facilities of our five sense organs.
- mkl 4y agoThere are many modern thinkers who don't just think about our other senses but make their careers on studying them through rigorous (even materialistic) experiment, e.g. balance, spatial orientation, proprioception, nociception etc. The notion that there are only five senses (let alone five sense organs) is well established to be false.
- rgrieselhuber 4y agoYes, but I didn't say there are no people who think about these things, just that there is a strong materialist bias in modern thinking against anything beyond the five senses. Progress is being made but we still have a long way to go.
- aaron695 4y ago> I can't work out why it's contentious Echolocation is contentious because people assume it's to do with timing. Humans can't time the echo in a room. Echolocation by humans is using the head as a dampener between the ears to get direction/distance by diffing the ears on noise not time. Is my understanding. You could see why people who think it's related to timing like the classic submarine would obviously think it doesn't work with humans. You learn about the speed of sound at a young age and people know the brain can't handle that. They might assume in a dark room people are using ambient noise and ambient echo's, not echolocation. With people using echolocation who are visually impaired in most articles they are not 100% blind so you are not sure what mix is going on. Most articles aren't explaining this well.
- spindle 4y agoAh! That makes sense, and was not what I was expecting at all. Thank you for explaining!