> EVERY state that requires ID to vote is required by law to provide free voting ID options. Every single one. I didn't dispute that. All I'm saying is that f

> EVERY state that requires ID to vote is required by law to provide free voting ID options. Every single one. I didn't dispute that. All I'm saying is that for people of reduced means or reduced mobility, getting these "free" ID cards is disproportionately more difficult. I'm not claiming to be an expert in these matters, but you really need to consider what 'just getting a free voting ID' looks like in practice: "For example, the office in Sauk City, Wisconsin is open only on the fifth Wednesday of any month. But only four months in 2012 — February, May, August, and October — have five Wednesdays."[0] "voters may be particularly affected by the significant costs of the documentation required to obtain a photo ID. Birth certificates can cost between $8 and $25. Marriage licenses, required for married women whose birth certificates include a maiden name, can cost between $8 and $20. By comparison, the notorious poll tax — outlawed during the civil rights era — cost $10.64 in current dollars."[0] "I will never forget the Navajo grandmother who spoke only Navajo and could not vote after Arizona passed its voter ID law in 2004. She tried several times to obtain an Arizona ID on her own but was denied because she was born at home in a hogan, and the boarding schools changed her Navajo name to English."[1] > there is not suppressed voter turnout in any demographic in any of those states. I'd love to see your data on this. The research I've found says quite the opposite: "Using this tool, the researchers confirmed what voting rights advocates already know to be true—that black voters are more likely to lack adequate identification under voter ID laws. According to the study, 3.6 percent of registered white voters had no match in any state or federal ID database. By contrast, 7.5 percent of black registered voters were missing from those databases."[2] Show me the incentives and I'll show you the outcome. I don't know why you find it so unbelievable that a party with the power to introduce partisan-biased voter suppressing laws, and with every incentive to do so, might in fact pass such laws. To assume that they wouldn't do so flies in the face of everything we know about government corruption and human nature. [0] https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/challenge-obtaining-voter-identification https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/chal... [1] https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/voting-rights/how-the-native-american-vote-continues-to-be-suppressed/ https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_r... [2] https://www.wired.com/story/voter-id-law-algorithm/ https://www.wired.com/story/voter-id-law-algorithm/