3 ms·
> It's not surprising or controversial, but it's in direct opposition to the idea that Twitter should allow all legal speech. The world is full of hypocrisy an
by MetaWhirledPeas 4y ago
> It's not surprising or controversial, but it's in direct opposition to the idea that Twitter should allow all legal speech.
The world is full of hypocrisy and Elon has his share. But I don't really care if the guy is a hypocrite; I'd be more interested in discussing if the move is right. If it violated internal company policy, or revealed internal identities or anything of that sort, then maybe it was the right move?
I'm just glad I don't have to make these decisions.
- X6S1x6Okd1st 4y agoWhich rule do you think it violated? https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules
- smittywerben 4y agoI think it violates private information policy. The last thing I want is my work name in a screenshot from an internal conversation posted on Twitter, reported by the news like I am a dissenter after getting terminated. I would want to be left completely alone. Extreme cases i.e. leaked passwords are under hacked materials policy. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-info... https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materials https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materi...