4 ms·

I'm not trying to refute your point. You're allowed to be a little less aggressive. Point being strikes typically hit C-levels indirectly, not directly. A shor

I'm not trying to refute your point. You're allowed to be a little less aggressive. Point being strikes typically hit C-levels indirectly, not directly. A short term loss and display of collective power which could be avoided with foresight. Individuals are more often targeted through boycotting.

kennend3 4y ago
So in the case of CUPE asking for 11.7% increase in pay, who is the C-Level involved, and what is the "point" they are trying to make besides simply demanding more money? How about this "strike"? "The 2019 General Motors strike began September 15, 2019, with the walkout of 48,000 United Automobile Workers from some 50 plants in the United States. Demands by workers included increased job security, gateway for temporary workers to become permanent, better pay and retaining healthcare benefits." what was the impact to the C-level? how did them demanding job security and better pay relate to them at all? There is pretty much NO case of union action ever attempting to impact directly or indirectly a C-Level person. They strike for Benefits, money, job security and that is about it.