3 ms·
(Because of unfounded claims of fraud, according to the losing candidate). It's a shame. There are many ways that the voting machines could be improved but that
by ufo 4y ago
(Because of unfounded claims of fraud, according to the losing candidate).
It's a shame. There are many ways that the voting machines could be improved but that will be much harder now that the far right has monopolized the discourse on auditable paper trails in their self-serving attempts to overturn valid election results.
- matheusmoreira 4y agoYour argument makes no sense to me. You think there's many ways the system can be improved. In other words, you think it's fallible. At the same time, you think any results produced by such a system are legitimate and should be accepted at face value. Why shouldn't "the far right" question results that are questionable?
- ufo 4y agoIf you really do believe the election was stolen, then I have a bridge to sell ya.
- matheusmoreira 4y agoWhere did I say I believed it? I said many people in my country believe it, and that it's okay to question such things. Nobody should have to accept a questionable election. Remember, such questioning is being literally censored and supreme court judges are publicly saying the results are "unquestionable" and anyone who spreads suspicion will be treated as anti-democratic criminals. If you really believe censorship and judiciary dictatorship is okay I really don't know what to say anymore.
- ufo 4y agoThat's kind of what I was saying. The far right pulled all the oxygen out of the room with their clown show. Any changes to the system will have to wait a couple of years until everyone has forgotten about it.