4 ms·
In the U.S. for security purposes - you definitely cut off email access before actual termination. Employee actions are unpredictable, and poses a legal & liab
by czbond 4y ago
In the U.S. for security purposes - you definitely cut off email access before actual termination. Employee actions are unpredictable, and poses a legal & liability risk to the company.
Not a lawyer, but employees are only required email access for all if company policy say they must. Usually the policies say access can be removed at any time for any purpose the company management desires, because they are, after all, the managements systems to operate and provide.
- insanitybit 4y ago> In the U.S. for security purposes - you definitely cut off email access before actual termination. This is done on the scale of hours, not months.
- czbond 4y agoIt's done on the scale of whatever time frame the management think the risk exists. In this case, if management thinks that risk exists for months - still acceptable. While unusual, if management needs to end the employment of staff but is precluded in doing so by law.... the only thing Twitter must do is provide normal compensation & benefits, nothing else. Under employment contracts, the employee must do whatever the employer deems acceptable (within legal limits, or leave under their own will.)
- insanitybit 4y agoAre you an employment lawyer? You're making a lot of assertions about what's acceptable.
- lupire 4y agoAre you?
- insanitybit 4y agoNo, and I haven't made any assertions about what any entity is legally obligated to do or not do...
- czbond 4y agoThis isn't about acceptable or law - it's basic company risk management.