3 ms·
And i fully respect that and i think your option to work on site should be granted. Also i appreciate you focusing on your preference and not seeking to fill in
by yrgulation 4y ago
And i fully respect that and i think your option to work on site should be granted. Also i appreciate you focusing on your preference and not seeking to fill in voids with other people. To be fair i do like reading and working from home allows me to do it more often. If there is a book i need i simply order it and have it delivered to my door - more time saved for reading. But that is what _i_ prefer and this debate should be focused around what individuals want and expect from all this without impacting others. Naturally all of this should be beneficial to employers as well because you know work is not charity. But an employer benefits from your being more productive at home or at the office then it should allow for whatever maximises their investment in you.
- coldpie 4y ago> this debate should be focused around what individuals want and expect from all this without impacting others I don't see anyone in this thread doing otherwise.
- yrgulation 4y agoI agree, this thread is more considerate than others. But some arguments for returning to office work imply having others return. In your case you have your own routine that doesn't rely on others changing theirs. But those who wish to return to onsite so they can socialise imply that everyone else needs to return. I mean who are they going to socialise with? Walls? Desks? Similarly those who can only convey their message to an audience thats in their immediate proximity imply that everyone else should return so they can sit and stare at whiteboards together.
- coldpie 4y agoOther people who also want to be in an office. My current WFH-friendly job has about 5 people who come in to the office most every day, and many others who drop in once a week or so.