I was mostly thinking on the recurring price of paying that debt, which, if I’m not mistaken, in cases like this one falls entirely on the acquired company (Twi

I was mostly thinking on the recurring price of paying that debt, which, if I’m not mistaken, in cases like this one falls entirely on the acquired company (Twitter, in this case). This is irrespective of Twitter’s financial status, that money has to be paid on a recurrent manner. That’s an extra cost on future Twitter of which I was not aware of, a cost entirely brought by this acquisition.