3 ms·
For some values of "perfectly profitable": Year Net profit / loss ($mm) 2012 -79 2013 -645 2014 -577 2015 -521 2016 -456 2017 -108
by kgwgk 4y ago
For some values of "perfectly profitable":
Year Net profit / loss ($mm)
2012 -79
2013 -645
2014 -577
2015 -521
2016 -456
2017 -108
2018 1206
2019 1466
2020 -1136
2021 -221
- vjeux 4y agoIf you sum all of this, that's -1071 for those like me that were curious.
- koonsolo 4y agoI get it that this is about profit. But to be fair, you have to factor in the valuation of the company to see if something was gained or lost in all those years.
- koonsolo 4y agoDid I say something stupid because of the downvotes? If a company chooses to reinvest the profit into the company, and therefore increases the valuation, it can be a gain, right? In that case no profit is made. If you have $1 loss and gain $3 valuation, that's a gain of $2, right?
- s1artibartfast 4y agoFrom an owner/investor perspective, you are correct. From the perspective of the corporate entity, you don't count valuation as profit/loss. For example, Twitter didn't make 44B revenue this year on the sale and you won't see it on their budget. Stock holders made that money. Same will be true again if Elon sells it for a profit or loss.
- koonsolo 4y agoTrue, but when the corporate entity makes revenue, you basically decide to either keep it as a profit, or reinvest into the company itself. You would assume that reinvesting means the company is growing and so is worth more. I get it that shares changing hands doesn't really change anything.
- s1artibartfast 4y agoI think that is a faulty assumption, and maybe that is what you got some down votes. A loss doesn't always mean reinvestment. Reinvestment doesn't always translate to growth. Growth doesn't always Translate to profitability or market value. It is staggeringly common that businesses fail despite investment and despite growth. Sometimes the product is bad or simply has limited scalability. Valuations can change rapidly based on expectations of future profit and market conditions. This is especially true in Tech and new companies where valuation is based on future potential and not current profitability. The general idea is that even if you do a lot of reinvesting and grow your market cap significantly, that market cap can evaporate if it seems unlikely that a company will actually turn into the cash machine people hoped that it would.
- hristov 4y agoLast full year (2021) was profitable if you ignore a massive one time shareholder litigation settlement payment. Usually one ignores these one time hits to evaluate the normal ongoing operation of the company.
- 93po 4y agoI would argue that settlement payments are an indicator of poor management, and unless something happens like a buyout then you can assume poor management will continue and there will continue to be risks of things like settlements.
- kgwgk 4y agoAs I said, for some (not-so-perfect) values of "perfectly profitable". For the curious the impact on net income was 766 millions.