> 3) Evan is mean. > I do not care. Is this not a valid objection? Surely there is a non-trivial economic cost associated with have a dickhead maintaining a cr

> 3) Evan is mean. > I do not care. Is this not a valid objection? Surely there is a non-trivial economic cost associated with have a dickhead maintaining a critical part of your stack, who's willing to remove support you rely on at his whim. > Elm is simple, write your own compiler. ... that is a significant economic cost; which if you have a non-trivial probability of having to do, drastically shifts the cost/benefit analysis in favour of JS.