3 ms·
CA is an “at will” employment state. Employees or employers may terminate with no cause and zero notice. Simultaneous terminations are not exempt. That’s a fac
by i_like_apis 4y ago
CA is an “at will” employment state. Employees or employers may terminate with no cause and zero notice. Simultaneous terminations are not exempt.
That’s a fact, friend.
- roflyear 4y agoStop spreading misinformation. The WARN act is a federal US law.
- i_like_apis 4y agoTypically in a tech layoff you revoke all access, 2 months paid salary, and effectively say “your project is complete, termination date 2 months from now”. That’s compliant and it happens all the time in CA. You’re making the claim they are not compliant and you have none of the info needed to make that claim. (You’re the disinfo, bub)
- roflyear 4y agoIf they are giving 60 day notice, they aren't breaking the law.
- i_like_apis 4y agoRight. That’s why 2 months paid salary is standard. With any severance on top. I've had this done a few times and I've witnessed it a few times. You guys were going around essentially saying "THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW!!!" it's a no notice layoff!!! And obviously there is no evidence for that. They are basically about to do the layoff "notice", which will also involve telling these people to stop working immediately and turn in their assets. Telling them to stop working is totally in compliance. I'll admit that I am not in HR. But, to be clear workers are still legally revoked all access and told to cease producing with no notice and that's fine. Layoffs exactly like this take place all the time.
- roflyear 4y agoThe context is if they are laying people off without giving 60 days, they are breaking the law. IDK what they are doing. But that is what people at Twitter are claiming (in some circumstances).
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]