I recognize my comment was dismissive, because I agree with my sibling comment here. I felt this is so obviously a sham and didn't expect it to be controversial

I recognize my comment was dismissive, because I agree with my sibling comment here. I felt this is so obviously a sham and didn't expect it to be controversial. Do you take issue with the point made or just the tone? Nobody on this thread seems to have explained what exactly makes this not a sham, for anyone even a little bit informed about the world it's obvious that inflation isn't due primarily to corporate profiteering even if that is happening. Do you expect this hearing will help to combat inflation in any meaningful way?