4 ms·
If you actually read the lawsuit - it was filed preemptively to ensure that Twitter give 60-days severance/notice period. There is no evidence listed in the su
by q1w2 4y ago
If you actually read the lawsuit - it was filed preemptively to ensure that Twitter give 60-days severance/notice period.
There is no evidence listed in the suit that says these employees were not given such notice.
Further, it specifically states that employees assumed that they were laid of without severance because they were locked out of their accounts and hadn't been yet presented a severance package.
The lawsuit is routine legal nonsense.
- voxl 4y agoYou are assuming both: that there was in fact 60 days notice (how!?) and that there is in fact a severance package. Yet, why would you not be openly communicative of this if you intend to give it? So how is it legal nonsense if the lawsuit has good faith reasons to believe that neither of your assumptions hold?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- kevstev 4y agoIt appears they did not file a WARN notice: https://edd.ca.gov/en/Jobs_and_Training/Layoff_Services_WARN https://edd.ca.gov/en/Jobs_and_Training/Layoff_Services_WARN Direct link to the list of recent WARN notices received: https://edd.ca.gov/siteassets/files/jobs_and_training/warn/warn_report.xlsx https://edd.ca.gov/siteassets/files/jobs_and_training/warn/w... I am not an expert on these things, but I believe this notice is required. I am surprised there is not an easier way to receive this information, this is certainly something I would want an alert set up on.