3 ms·
The Reuters article I linked was literally in response to the (false) claim by FT about the cancelation. FT had "sources", while Reuters had a direct statement
by filoleg 4y ago
The Reuters article I linked was literally in response to the (false) claim by FT about the cancelation.
FT had "sources", while Reuters had a direct statement from L'Oreal itself, confirming that there was no pull of ad spending.