3 ms·
Or you could use the Readable Lisp S-Expressions [1] project from Wheeler's and Gloria's to use Lisp with Python-like syntax. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/que
by TuringTest 4y ago
Or you could use the Readable Lisp S-Expressions [1] project from Wheeler's and Gloria's to use Lisp with Python-like syntax.
[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9533139/what-would-clojure-lose-by-switching-away-from-leading-parenthesis-like-dylan-j/17524527#17524527 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9533139/what-would-cloju...
- tmtvl 4y agoWell, if you are going to mention alternative syntaxes, another possibility may be Wisp: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-119/ https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-119/
- TuringTest 4y agoThanks, I didn't know that syntax. What are the advantages of Wisp over sweet-expressions?