3 ms·
If you don't like long sequences of closing parentheses, you could try Lisp Butt Mode for Emacs: https://gitlab.com/marcowahl/lisp-butt-mode https://gitlab.com/
by tmtvl 4y ago
If you don't like long sequences of closing parentheses, you could try Lisp Butt Mode for Emacs: https://gitlab.com/marcowahl/lisp-butt-mode https://gitlab.com/marcowahl/lisp-butt-mode
- TuringTest 4y agoOr you could use the Readable Lisp S-Expressions [1] project from Wheeler's and Gloria's to use Lisp with Python-like syntax. [1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9533139/what-would-clojure-lose-by-switching-away-from-leading-parenthesis-like-dylan-j/17524527#17524527 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9533139/what-would-cloju...
- tmtvl 4y agoWell, if you are going to mention alternative syntaxes, another possibility may be Wisp: https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-119/ https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-119/
- TuringTest 4y agoThanks, I didn't know that syntax. What are the advantages of Wisp over sweet-expressions?