2 ms·

ah, so the one who is supposed to make money from his/her skill is given pittance while distribution and marketing people take the cake. fine. edit: if onlyfa

ah, so the one who is supposed to make money from his/her skill is given pittance while distribution and marketing people take the cake. fine. edit: if onlyfans can allow questionable skills be monetized and give millions to the um, performers, surely an author can find a way to sell their own books themselves

JumpCrisscross 4y ago
> the one who is supposed to make money from his/her skill is given pittance while distribution and marketing people take the cake You may want to read on the economics of publishing instead of working off assumptions [1]. Scientific publishers are a scam. But trade fiction and nonfiction publishing isn’t a moneymaker. [1] https://www.almostanauthor.com/the-economics-of-publishing/ https://www.almostanauthor.com/the-economics-of-publishing/
- 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
  i need some numbers... $100 book(fiction for ease of understanding), how much does each entity in the chain from author to consumer earns? if that is the economics, where does digital books and audibooks fare? why do you need the intermediaries in that thing? same for amazon? its not like i HAVE to pay a printer to publish a digital ebook so if that is removed from the pie, shouldn't the author "get" that portion also?
jrm4 4y ago
I've always said that onlyfans is one of the more ethical platforms; there's less of a question of who gets paid and how.
- 2Gkashmiri 4y ago
  so what is the role of publishers and marketers and whole dinosaur industry that should die already. i've had a proposal. From a $100 physical book, an author makes say 5%. That is all their work as the original work and remuneration they get so if we move to digital, how about the author double or triple that to say $15. add another $5 for delivery and the same book now costs me $20 and the author gets "more" money, something they actually want and what i want, to consume the content created and support the author and be easy on the wallet. this would probably kill the paper book model overnight but i really don't have concerns about the poor publishers and printers who would go out of job

JumpCrisscross 4y ago

> the one who is supposed to make money from his/her skill is given pittance while distribution and marketing people take the cake You may want to read on the economics of publishing instead of working off assumptions [1]. Scientific publishers are a scam. But trade fiction and nonfiction publishing isn’t a moneymaker. [1] https://www.almostanauthor.com/the-economics-of-publishing/ https://www.almostanauthor.com/the-economics-of-publishing/

2Gkashmiri 4y ago
i need some numbers... $100 book(fiction for ease of understanding), how much does each entity in the chain from author to consumer earns? if that is the economics, where does digital books and audibooks fare? why do you need the intermediaries in that thing? same for amazon? its not like i HAVE to pay a printer to publish a digital ebook so if that is removed from the pie, shouldn't the author "get" that portion also?

jrm4 4y ago

I've always said that onlyfans is one of the more ethical platforms; there's less of a question of who gets paid and how.

2Gkashmiri 4y ago
so what is the role of publishers and marketers and whole dinosaur industry that should die already. i've had a proposal. From a $100 physical book, an author makes say 5%. That is all their work as the original work and remuneration they get so if we move to digital, how about the author double or triple that to say $15. add another $5 for delivery and the same book now costs me $20 and the author gets "more" money, something they actually want and what i want, to consume the content created and support the author and be easy on the wallet. this would probably kill the paper book model overnight but i really don't have concerns about the poor publishers and printers who would go out of job