3 ms·
> Hate is something we only recently started accusing others of. Because hate was normalized before, just like child abuse, spousal abuse, and any number of ot
by danans 4y ago
> Hate is something we only recently started accusing others of.
Because hate was normalized before, just like child abuse, spousal abuse, and any number of other terrible things that we call out by name now.
Just because we didn't have a general word for what inspired lynchings doesn't mean it didn't exist.
- motohagiography 4y agoWhat was normal was not hate, and hate - as an extreme emotion - was never normal, but if belief in hate is the root of one's entire ontology, there isn't common ground with someone who doesn't have that princple. Acts of hate absolutely occurred, especially systemic ones that resulted in genocides, but what was considered normal was not hate. We have adapted the word to mean something it did not previously. Just like we don't attribute to malice what can be attributed to stupidity, I'd say the same thing about modern hate and self-interest. The instances of the other examples have only barely been reduced by identifying them, and in many cases, it has licensed behaviours that don't fit the definition, and it has empowered a layer of people who have jobs effectively managing and extracting value from them now, imo. Like malice, I reject hate, and in doing so, I also reject indexing on it as the axiom for a positive morality.