> > Ubuntu is the developer distro after all > I'd have assumed Arch and friends. I'm a huge Arch (and NixOS) user. But one of the things that I think is diff

> > Ubuntu is the developer distro after all > I'd have assumed Arch and friends. I'm a huge Arch (and NixOS) user. But one of the things that I think is difficult about Arch in an enterprise is that by design it is difficult to standardize enterprise tooling around. Ubuntu, on the other hand, has a bunch of defaults that can be more reliably be predicted for in an enterprise. I'm a security engineer and I've thought long and hard about why enterprise applications often lack Linux support -- it would be difficult to have something that works across the board (there are so many choices of desktop environments, notification daemons, network subsystems, etc.). If I were to write enterprise applications that targeted Linux I would probably target the default config of the current LTS release of Ubuntu (Gnome as the desktop environment, etc.). I feel like Ubuntu is the desktop developer environment for the enterprise that is forward enough to support desktop Linux.