4 ms·
That's unambiguous to you? It's equivalent to "you were fired for reasons".
by karaterobot 4y ago
That's unambiguous to you? It's equivalent to "you were fired for reasons".
- za3faran 4y agoDo you think that will sit well with a potential future employer regardless?
- Firmwarrior 4y agoI dunno man, if I had a spare $300-$600k/year lying around I'd love to have this guy work for me even if he is a whiny smart aleck
- cmrdporcupine 4y agoSaid person could go back to working at Google anytime, likely. I don't think he needs to worry about covering for his reputation on this matter.
- tschwimmer 4y agoI think the operant phrase is “policy violations.” I’ve never heard that associated with anything but breaking a corporate rule: talking to the media unauthorized, leaking, harassment, etc.