Perhaps it could be argued that Copilot was an unexpected development, and the users of GitHub could not possibly have intended to donate all their work to be u

Perhaps it could be argued that Copilot was an unexpected development, and the users of GitHub could not possibly have intended to donate all their work to be used anonymously and without attribution? It's a bit like how non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California. The Copilot theft of intellectual property might be viewed as being too far from anyone's reasonable expectations? We'll see how the legal battle turns out.