2 ms·
FT disagrees: https://www.ft.com/content/17281b81-b801-4a8f-8065-76d3ffb400fa https://www.ft.com/content/17281b81-b801-4a8f-8065-76d3ffb40...
by threeseed 4y ago
FT disagrees: https://www.ft.com/content/17281b81-b801-4a8f-8065-76d3ffb400fa https://www.ft.com/content/17281b81-b801-4a8f-8065-76d3ffb40...
- filoleg 4y agoThe Reuters article I linked was literally in response to the (false) claim by FT about the cancelation. FT had "sources", while Reuters had a direct statement from L'Oreal itself, confirming that there was no pull of ad spending.