> It's easy to train non-programmers to use Elm. (If you can solve Sudoku you can learn to program.) Training developers is expensive. The less experience they

> It's easy to train non-programmers to use Elm. (If you can solve Sudoku you can learn to program.) Training developers is expensive. The less experience they have, the more expensive it is (generally). > Elm is simple, write your own compiler. The economic argument against this is it isn't easy (expensive) to write and maintain your own compiler.