4 ms·
> Andy and S-team decided this week to pause on new incremental hires > We still intend to hire a meaningful number of people in 2023 Am I missing something,
by scubbo 4y ago
> Andy and S-team decided this week to pause on new incremental hires
> We still intend to hire a meaningful number of people in 2023
Am I missing something, or are these contradictory?
- joshribakoff 4y agoSounds like they won’t be passively backfilling, but will still actively recruit for select projects.
- MuffinFlavored 4y agowhich sounds bad if you are on a team with somebody who quits/gets fired/gets laid off
- scubbo 4y agoI'm sure there's no correlation between "teams with people leaving" and "teams that are under-funded or struggling"...
- scubbo 4y agoHuh. That's almost the opposite of what I understood - "new incremental hires" sounds like active recruiting, but I could see "passive recruiting" falling outside that heading. Who knows? It's HR PR, it means whatever they want it to mean.
- fnordpiglet 4y agoI read this to mean “hiring freeze for a bit but resume soon”