3 ms·

It’ll cost you $90 per terabyte to exit from S3. If I’m reading this right, the first 100GB per month out of AWS is now free? https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws

It’ll cost you $90 per terabyte to exit from S3. If I’m reading this right, the first 100GB per month out of AWS is now free? https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/aws-price-reduction-data-transfers-internet/ https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/aws-price... So you can subtract $9.

killingtime74 4y ago
Only if you are small enough to be paying full price, in which case how do you have that much data?
- andrewstuart 4y ago
  Can you explain what you mean? How much do you think companies pay for data egress from AWS?
  - killingtime74 4y ago
    Can't disclose specifics but if you look around on internet (AWS EDP) you can see organizations that have a certain level of spend have massive discount on egress/S3 storage pricing. Discount on top of the tiered pricing. e.g. US Ohio: Greater than 150 TB / Month $0.05 per GB, then another XX% on top of that.
  - whoknew1122 4y ago
    Depending on your monthly spend, you can get private pricing agreements for most AWS services. But I can't really get into numbers because I like being employed.
- qeternity 4y ago
  Terabytes of a data is small. You’re not getting discounts from Amazon at that scale.
ignoramous 4y ago
For this reason, we now switch between sources in s3 and r2. Any artifact stored after 1666666666666 (25 Oct 2022) is in r2 for us (yeah, we universally include timestamp in s3/r2 keys/prefixes).
- toomuchtodo 4y ago
  Do you intend to migrate to backfill r2 and make it primary/sole object store?
  - ignoramous 4y ago
    Not planning to move all of it (in fact, doing so would be costlier given our current workload patterns which are time sensitive and hence over a period of next few months, S3 usage should dwindle organically), but rather manage the data out with lifecycle rules eventually into S3-InfrequentAccess.
- ezekg 4y ago
  Came to the same conclusion. Will probably do this so that we eventually migrate to R2, without the need to backfill.

killingtime74 4y ago

Only if you are small enough to be paying full price, in which case how do you have that much data?

andrewstuart 4y ago
Can you explain what you mean? How much do you think companies pay for data egress from AWS?
- killingtime74 4y ago
  Can't disclose specifics but if you look around on internet (AWS EDP) you can see organizations that have a certain level of spend have massive discount on egress/S3 storage pricing. Discount on top of the tiered pricing. e.g. US Ohio: Greater than 150 TB / Month $0.05 per GB, then another XX% on top of that.
- whoknew1122 4y ago
  Depending on your monthly spend, you can get private pricing agreements for most AWS services. But I can't really get into numbers because I like being employed.
qeternity 4y ago
Terabytes of a data is small. You’re not getting discounts from Amazon at that scale.

ignoramous 4y ago

For this reason, we now switch between sources in s3 and r2. Any artifact stored after 1666666666666 (25 Oct 2022) is in r2 for us (yeah, we universally include timestamp in s3/r2 keys/prefixes).

toomuchtodo 4y ago
Do you intend to migrate to backfill r2 and make it primary/sole object store?
- ignoramous 4y ago
  Not planning to move all of it (in fact, doing so would be costlier given our current workload patterns which are time sensitive and hence over a period of next few months, S3 usage should dwindle organically), but rather manage the data out with lifecycle rules eventually into S3-InfrequentAccess.
ezekg 4y ago
Came to the same conclusion. Will probably do this so that we eventually migrate to R2, without the need to backfill.